Advertisement
Review Article| Volume 45, ISSUE 1, P131-140, September 2011

Is There a Role for Bowel Preparation and Oral or Parenteral Antibiotics In Infection Control in Contemporary Colon Surgery?

  • Susan Galandiuk
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
    Affiliations
    Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA

    Price Institute of Surgical Research, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA

    Blizard Institute of Cell & Molecular Science, Barts & The London School of Medicine & Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
    Search for articles by this author
  • Donald E. Fry
    Affiliations
    Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Hiram C. Polk Jr.
    Affiliations
    Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, School of Medicine, Louisville, KY 40292, USA
    Search for articles by this author
      Over the past 90 years, colorectal resection has been associated with a progressive increase in safety for what is still a major and frequently performed operation. It has often been stated that the wide use of antibiotics after World War II was associated with increasing survival after colon surgery [
      • Poth E.J.
      Historical development of intestinal antisepsis.
      ]; as a matter of fact, the broad application and use of blood banks in the late 1930s [
      • Polk Jr., H.C.
      The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the colon and rectum: its evolution in one university hospital.
      ] and the improved care overall associated with the proliferation of intensive care units in the 1990s correlate better with those improvements. Although there are still outliers in institutional mortality rates in colon surgery, the mortality rate for a large number of voluntarily reporting university teaching and affiliated hospitals is just under 2% for elective operations. Interestingly, even after anastomotic leak, rescue by an early diagnosis and appropriate systemic management, often including diversion, is so much the rule that death rates are still low (Fig. 1) [
      • Goldfarb M.A.
      • Baker T.
      An eight-year analysis of surgical morbidity and mortality: data and solutions.
      ].
      Figure thumbnail gr1
      Fig. 1Colon resection risk adjusted mortality by hospital for the fourth quarter of 2004 through the first quarter of 2010. These data were provided by the University HealthSystem Consortium and reflects results in 101, 722 patients, of whom 1774 died in hospitals. The risk adjustment was accomplished by proprietary logistic regression modeling techniques, where each patient is assigned a severity of illness level and with it expected length of stay, costs, and mortality. Although the overall mortality is acceptable, it is apparent that some hospitals (to the far right on this figure) have considerable room for improvement (Polk HC Jr, Hohmann S, unpublished data, 2011). Red line is the median.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Advances in Surgery
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Poth E.J.
        Historical development of intestinal antisepsis.
        World J Surg. 1982; 6: 153-159
        • Polk Jr., H.C.
        The surgical treatment of carcinoma of the colon and rectum: its evolution in one university hospital.
        Arch Surg. 1965; 91: 958-962
        • Goldfarb M.A.
        • Baker T.
        An eight-year analysis of surgical morbidity and mortality: data and solutions.
        Am Surg. 2006; 72: 1070-1081
        • Wren S.M.
        • Ahmed N.
        • Jamal A.
        • et al.
        Preoperative oral antibiotics in colorectal surgery increase the rate of Clostridium difficile colitis.
        Arch Surg. 2005; 140: 752-756
        • Soop M.
        • Nelson H.
        Is laparoscopic resection appropriate for colorectal adenocarcinoma?.
        Adv Surg. 2008; 42: 205-217
        • Fleshman J.
        • Sargent D.J.
        • Green E.
        • et al.
        Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.
        Ann Surg. 2007; 246: 655-662
        • Sonoda T.
        • Pandey S.
        • Trencheva K.
        • et al.
        Long-term complications of hand-assisted versus laparoscopic colectomy.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2009; 208: 62-66
        • Stocchi L.
        • Milsom J.W.
        • Fazio V.W.
        Long-term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open ileocolic resection for Crohn’s disease: follow-up of a prospective randomized trial.
        Surgery. 2008; 144: 622-627
        • MacFarlane J.K.
        • Ryall R.D.H.
        • Heald R.J.
        Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.
        Lancet. 1993; 341: 457-460
        • Stottmeier S.
        • Harling H.
        • Wille-Jorgensen P.
        • et al.
        Pathogenesis of morbidity after fast-track laparoscopic colonic cancer surgery.
        Colorectal Dis. 2011; 13: 500-505
        • Faiz O.
        • Warusavitarne J.
        • Bottle A.
        • et al.
        Nonelective excisional colorectal surgery in English National Health Service Trusts: a study of outcomes from Hospital Episode Statistics Data between 1996 and 2007.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210: 390-401
        • Smith R.I.
        • Bohl J.K.
        • McElearney S.T.
        • et al.
        Wound infection after elective colorectal resection.
        Ann Surg. 2004; 239: 599-607
        • Polk Jr., H.C.
        • Lopez-Mayor J.F.
        Postoperative wound infection: a prospective study of determinant factors and prevention.
        Surgery. 1969; 66: 97-103
        • Baum M.L.
        • Anish D.S.
        • Chalmers T.C.
        • et al.
        A survey of clinical trials of antibiotic prophylaxis in colon surgery: evidence against further use of no-treatment controls.
        N Engl J Med. 1981; 305: 795-799
        • Barber M.S.
        • Hirschberg B.C.
        • Rice C.L.
        • et al.
        Parenteral antibiotics in elective colon surgery? A prospective, controlled clinical study.
        Surgery. 1979; 86: 23-29
        • Hanel K.C.
        • King D.W.
        • McAllister E.T.
        • et al.
        Single dose parenteral antibiotics as prophylaxis against wound infections in colonic operations.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1980; 25: 98-101
        • Lazorthes F.
        • Legrand G.
        • Monrozies X.
        • et al.
        Comparison between oral and systemic antibiotics and their combined use for the prevention of complications in colorectal surgery.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1982; 25: 309-311
        • Milsom J.W.
        • Smith D.L.
        • Corman M.L.
        • et al.
        Double-blind comparison of single dose alatrofloxacin and cefotetan as prophylaxis of infection following elective colorectal surgery.
        Am J Surg. 1998; 176: 46S-52S
        • Altpeter T.
        • Luckhardt K.
        • Lewis J.N.
        • et al.
        Expanded surgical time out: a key to real-time data collection and quality improvement.
        J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 205: e4-e5
        • Itani K.M.
        • Wilson S.E.
        • Awad S.S.
        • et al.
        Ertapenem versus cefotetan prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery.
        N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 2640-2651
        • Kaiser A.B.
        • Herrington J.L.
        • Jacobs J.K.
        • et al.
        Cefoxitin versus erythromycin, neomycin, and cefazolin in colorectal operations.
        Ann Surg. 1983; 198: 525-530
        • Lau W.Y.
        • Chu K.W.
        • Poon G.P.
        • et al.
        Prophylactic antibiotics in elective colorectal surgery.
        Br J Surg. 1988; 75: 782-785
        • Coppa G.F.
        • Eng K.
        Factors involved in antibiotic selection in elective colon and rectal surgery.
        Surgery. 1988; 104: 853-858
        • Reynolds J.R.
        • Jones J.A.
        • Evans D.F.
        • et al.
        Do preoperative oral antibiotics influence sepsis rates following elective colorectal surgery in patients receiving perioperative intravenous prophylaxis?.
        Surg Res Commun. 1989; 7: 71-77
        • Khubchandani I.T.
        • Karamchandani M.C.
        • Sheets J.I.
        • et al.
        Metronidazole vs erythromycin, neomycin, and cefazolin in prophylaxis for colonic surgery.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 1989; 32: 17-20
        • Stellato T.A.
        • Danzinger L.H.
        • Gordon N.
        • et al.
        Antibiotics in elective colon surgery.
        Am Surg. 1990; 56: 251-254
        • Taylor E.W.
        • Lindsay G.
        Selective decontamination of the colon before elective colorectal surgery.
        World J Surg. 1994; 18: 926-932
        • McArdle C.S.
        • Morran C.G.
        • Pettit L.
        • et al.
        Value of oral antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery.
        Br J Surg. 1995; 82: 1046-1048
        • Lewis R.T.
        Oral versus systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colon surgery: a randomized study and meta-analysis send a message from the 1990s.
        Can J Surg. 2002; 45: 173-180
        • Galandiuk S.
        • Polk Jr., H.C.
        • Jagelman D.G.
        • et al.
        Reemphasis of priorities in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.
        Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1989; 169: 219-222
        • Contant C.M.E.
        • Hop W.J.C.
        • van’t Sant H.P.
        • et al.
        Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery: a multicenter randomized trial.
        Lancet. 2007; 370: 2112-2117
        • Fa-Si-Oen P.
        • Roumen R.
        • Buitenweg J.
        • et al.
        Mechanical bowel preparation or not? Outcome of a multicenter, randomized trial in elective open colon surgery.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2005; 48: 1509-1516
        • Miettinen R.P.J.
        • Laitinen S.T.
        • Makela J.T.
        • et al.
        Bowel preparation with oral polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution vs. no preparation in elective open colon resection.
        Dis Colon Rectum. 2000; 43: 669-675
        • Bucher P.
        • Gervaz P.
        • Soravia C.
        • et al.
        Randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before elective left-sided colorectal surgery.
        Br J Surg. 2005; 92: 409-414
        • Ram E.
        • Sherman Y.
        • Weil R.
        • et al.
        Is mechanical bowel preparation mandatory for elective colon surgery?.
        Arch Surg. 2005; 140: 285-288
        • Zmora O.
        • Mahajna A.
        • Bar-Zakai B.
        • et al.
        Is mechanical bowel preparation mandatory for left-sided colonic anastomosis? Results of a prospective randomized trial.
        Tech Coloproctol. 2006; 10: 131-135
        • Jung B.
        • Pahlman L.
        • Nystrom P.O.
        • et al.
        Multicentre randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation in elective colon resection.
        Br J Surg. 2007; 94: 689-695
        • Pena-Soria M.J.
        • Mayol J.M.
        • Anula R.
        • et al.
        Single-blinded randomized trial of mechanical bowel preparation for colon surgery with primary intraperitoneal anastomosis.
        J Gastrointest Surg. 2008; 12: 2103-2109
        • van’t Sant H.P.
        • Weidema W.F.
        • Hop W.C.
        • et al.
        The influence of mechanical bowel preparation in elective lower colorectal surgery.
        Ann Surg. 2010; 251: 59-63
        • Zhu Q.D.
        • Zhang Q.Y.
        • Zeng Q.Q.
        • et al.
        Efficacy of mechanical bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol in prevention of postoperative complications in elective colorectal surgery: a meta analysis.
        Int J Colorectal Dis. 2010; 25: 267-275
        • Garlock J.H.
        • Seley G.P.
        The use of sulfanilamide in surgery of the colon and rectum. Preliminary report.
        Surgery. 1939; 5: 787
        • Firor W.M.
        • Jonas A.F.
        The use of sulfanilylguanidine in surgical patients.
        Ann Surg. 1941; 114: 19
        • Firor W.M.
        • Poth E.J.
        Intestinal antisepsis with special reference to sulfanilylguanidine.
        Ann Surg. 1941; 114: 663-671
        • Itani K.M.
        • Wilson S.E.
        • Awad S.S.
        • et al.
        Polyethylene glycol versus sodium phosphate mechanical bowel preparation in elective colorectal surgery.
        Am J Surg. 2007; 193: 190-194
        • Ezri T.
        • Lerner E.
        • Muggia-Sullam M.
        • et al.
        Phosphate salt bowel preparation regimens alter perioperative acid-base and electrolyte balance.
        Can J Anaesth. 2006; 53: 153-158
        • Long J.
        • Zaborina O.
        • Holbrook C.
        • et al.
        Depletion of intestinal phosphate after operative injury activates the virulence of P aeruginosa causing lethal gut-derived sepsis.
        Surgery. 2008; 144: 189-197
        • Poth E.J.
        • Ross C.A.
        The clinical use of phthalylsulfathioazole.
        J Lab Clin Med. 1944; 29: 785-808
        • Cohn Jr., I.
        Kanamycin for bowel sterilization.
        Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1958; 76: 212-217
        • Washington II, J.A.
        • Dearing W.H.
        • Judd E.S.
        • et al.
        Effect of preoperative antibiotic regimen on development of infection after intestinal surgery: prospective, randomized, double-blind study.
        Ann Surg. 1974; 180: 567-571
        • Clarke J.S.
        • Condon R.E.
        • Bartlett J.G.
        • et al.
        Preoperative oral antibiotics reduce septic complications of colon operations: results of prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study.
        Ann Surg. 1977; 186: 251-259
        • Lewis R.T.
        • Goodall R.G.
        • Marien M.
        • et al.
        Is neomycin necessary for bowel preparation in surgery of the colon? Oral neomycin plus erythromycin versus erythromycin-metronidazole.
        Can J Surg. 1989; 32: 265-278
        • Ahmed S.
        • MacFarlane G.T.
        • Fite A.
        • et al.
        Mucosa-associated bacterial density in relation to human terminal ileum and colonic biopsy samples.
        Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 73: 7435-7442
        • Guenaga K.K.
        • Matos D.
        • Wille-Jorgensen P.
        Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; 1 (CD001544)
        • Farnell M.B.
        • Worthington-Self S.
        • Mucha Jr., P.
        • et al.
        Closure of abdominal incisions with subcutaneous catheters.
        Arch Surg. 1986; 121: 641-648
        • Galandiuk S.
        • Wrightson W.R.
        • Young S.
        • et al.
        Absorbable delayed release antibiotic beads reduce surgical wound infection.
        Am Surg. 1997; 63: 831-835